Saint in the Space of the City (by the Monuments of Novgorod Hagiography)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-2(3)-30-41

Darya Tereshkina
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Russia
[email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0002-2079-1116

Abstract

The article offers a look at the relationship city–person on the material of medieval Novgorod hagiography. The saint, canonized by the church, in his earthly life is an example of the concentrated relationship of the individual and the city as a locus and as a community of its inhabitants. These relationships are multidimensional and can be represented as confrontation and unity. The city is an arena for the manifestation of human passions, and therefore staying in it becomes a test. Ascetics retire to the desert to be able to communicate with God and their inner selves, but they cannot be completely outside the city, they enter into diverse relationships with the urban community and its individual representatives, and the confrontation often turns into the unity of the saint and the city during the life of the ascetic. The city is a God-chosen and preserved place, and prayer for it as a prototype of the Heavenly Jerusalem and for its inhabitants becomes the constant care of the saint. The saint himself, after his earthly journey, becomes an eternal inhabitant of the city, being present in it with his relics, shrines associated with him, the very name that the townspeople worship. The city, saved by the prayers of the righteous, becomes a sacred space that organizes the spiritual life of its inhabitants.

Keywords: Novgorod hagiography, city, saint, sacralisation of space, confrontation, unity, Heavenly Jerusalem, prototype.

REFERENCES

Legend 1999 – The Legend of the Battle of the Novgorodians with the Suzdalians. Library of Literature of Ancient Russia. Vol. 6 (XIV–mid XV century.). St. Petersburg, 1999. P. 444–449. In Russian.

Novgorod Regional Dictionary 2010 – Novgorod Regional Dictionary. Еd. by A. N. Levichkin and S. A. Myznikov; [auth.-comp.: A. V. Klevtsova et al.]. St. Petersburg, 2010. In Russian.

Okhotnikova 1985 – Okhotnikova V. I. The Tale of Dovmont: Research and Texts. St. Petersburg, 1985. In Russian.

Pervushin 2020 – Pervushin M. V. Several Views on one Life: literary Images of Prince Vsevolod of Pskov. Hermeneutics of Old Russian literature. 2020. 19. P. 507–525. In Russian.

Rudy 2006 – Rudy T. R. On the Composition and Topic of the Lives of the Venerable. Proceedings of the Department of Ancient Russian Literature. Vol. 57. St. Petersburg, 2006. P. 431–500. In Russian.

Sertakova 2014 – Sertakova E. A. The Concept of City in Russian Culture. Man and Culture, 2014. 2. P. 97–126. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.2.12044. In Russian.

Smirnov 2021 – Smirnov S. A Person in the City and the City in a Person, or Once again about the Subject of Urban Anthropology (1). Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2021. 1. P. 12–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2021-1-12-36. In Russian.

Tereshkina 2006 – Tereshkina D. B. Novgorod Hagiographic Literature: A Textbook for a special Course. Veliky Novgorod, 2006. In Russian.

The Life of Mikhail Klopsky 1958 – Stories about the Life of Mikhail Klopsky. Prep. texts and art. L. A. Dmitrieva. M., L., 1958. P. 89–167. In Russian.

The Life of Varlaam Khutynsky 1881 – The Life of Varlaam Khutynsky in two Copies. OLDP. Issue 41. St. Petersburg, 1881. In Russian.

The Vision of the Sexton Tarasius 1984 – The Vision of the Sexton Tarasius. Monuments of literature of Ancient Russia. End XV – 1 half of the XVI century. Moscow, 1984. P. 416–421. In Russian.

The Тale 1999 – The Tale of the Journey of John of Novgorod on the Devil. Library of Literature of Ancient Russia. Vol. 6 (XIV–mid XV century). St. Petersburg, 1999. P. 450–459. In Russian.

About author

Daria B. Tereshkina
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Russia
E-mail: terdb@ mail.ru

For citation:
Tereshkina D. Saint in the Space of the City (by the Monuments of Novgorod Hagiography). Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2022. 2 (3). P. 30–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-2(3)-30-41