Published

15.06.2022

Issue

№ 1 (2022): URBIS ET ORBIS

Section

Articles

Places-Palimpsests of Saint Petersburg and Their Names

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-142-156

 

Katarzyna Janik-Borecka
Institute of Russian and Ukrainian Studies after Adam Mickiewicz University, 
Poznań (Poland)
[email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0002-7912-2179

 

Abstract

 

The paper deals with the issue of places-palimpsests in modern onomastics. Our goal is to present some onyms (especially temples' names) of Saint Petersburg as palimpsests of the urban onomasticon. The research seems very timely due to the increased interest in sacred objects. The article will begin with an explanation of the definition of the temples’, which was proposed by N.V. Podolskaya. In Russian-language works, the term ecclesionim is used. However, it is not popular in other works. Later, the palimpsest metaphor will be explained and introduced. A palimpsest is a type of writing superimposed over an old text that has been partially worn out. Interestingly, after some time, the old text starts to show through the new one. This metaphor is actively used in geographical science, but not in onomastic research. It is important to point out that the palimpsest has many layers and contexts. The article presents a new approach to the study of onyms as texts. The latest works in the field of intertextuality of proper names are also cited. It is mainly about works by Bożena Hrynkiewicz-Adamskich and Małgorzata Rutkiewicz-Hanczewska. In what follows part of the article, attention is drawn to the history of the name of the city of St. Petersburg. The city changed its name several times, erasing the previous one as if it were a palimpsest. The most essential part of the article is our definition of onym-palimpsest. In our opinion, it is a multi-layered name that contains various contexts and meanings. Next, we present many examples of such names in Saint Petersburg. This article can be used for further research on urbanonymy. One could analyze not only Orthodox onyms-palimpsest but also other denominations. The research can also be extended to other cities or entire countries of the former USSR.

 

Keywords: onomasticon of Saint Petersburg, temple name, city renaming, place-palimpsest, onym-palimpsest.

 

REFERENCES

 

Basik 2018 – Basik S. N. Name and Place: Toponymic Palimpsest in geocultural Space. Modern Problems of Territorial Development. 2018. 3. ID 51. In Russian.


Demyanov, Ryzhenko 2017 – Demyanov K. V., Ryzhenko V. G. Ideology, Toponymy, Policy of Memory: about City’s Renaming in the USSR. Herald of Omsk University. Series Historical sciences. 2017. 4. P. 153–160. In Russian.


Denisov 2012 – Denisov I. N. The Hero City of Leningrad: The History of Transformation into St. Petersburg. Society. Environment. Development (Terra Humana). 2012. P. 125–130. In Russian.

 

Gorbachevich, Khablo 1998 – Gorbachevich K. S., Khablo E. P. Why are they named like that? On the origin of the names of streets, squares, islands, rivers, and bridges of St. Petersburg. Saint Petersburg, 1998. In Russian.

 

Gusarov 2014 – Gusarov A. Y. Lost Churches of St. Petersburg. Saint Petersburg, 2014. In Russian.

 

Hrynkiewicz-Adamskich 2015 – Hrynkiewicz-Adamskich B. Russian Place Names Motivated by Personal Names and Their Functions (Diachronic Approach). Onomastica. 2015. 59. P. 241–253. In Polish.

 

Hrynkiewicz-Adamskich 2018 – Hrynkiewicz-Adamskich B. On some Aspects of Proprial Intertextualisation in the Light of Recent Research. Studia Rossica Posnaniensia. 2018. 41. P. 289–304. In Russian.

 

Kobak, Lur'e 1993 – Kobak A. V., Lur'e L. Y. Gromovskoye Cemetery. Historical cemeteries of St. Petersburg: A guidebook. 1993. P. 424–429. In Russian.

 

Komac 2009 – Komac B. Social Memory and Geographical Memory of Natural Disasters. Acta geographica Slovenica. 2009. 1 (49). P. 199–226.

 

Lotman, Uspenskiy 1996 – Uspenskiy A. V., Lotman Yu. M. Echoes of the Concept of "Moscow — the Third Rome" in the Ideology of Peter the Great. The Artistic language of the Middle Ages. Ed. by V. A. Karpushin. Moscow, 1982. P. 236–249. URL: https://clck.ru/qFi3d. In Russian.

 

Lukina 2018 – Lukina O. A. Ecclesionymics as a Science: Subject, History, Prospects of Development. Scientists Notes of Educational Institution "Vitebsk State University after P. M. Masherov". 2018. Vol. 25. P. 143–147. In Russian.


Mitin 2008 – Mitin I. I. A Place as a Palimpsest. 60 parallels. 2008. 4. P. 20–25. In Russian.

 

Mitin 2014 – Mitin I. I. Place as a Palimpsest: a Mythogeographical Approach in Cultural Geography. The phenomenon of culture in Russian social geography: expert opinions, analytics, concepts. Ed. by A. G. Druzhinina, V. N. Streletskogo. 2014. P. 147–156. In Russian.

 

Podolskaya 1988 – Podolskaya A. V. Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology. Moscow, 1988. In Russian.

 

Pospelov 1993 – Pospelov E. M. Names of Cities yesterday and today (1917–1992). Moscow, 1993. In Russian.

 

Romanyuk 1992 – Romanyuk S. K. Moscow Losses: about the Destruction of Architectural Monuments in Moscow after 1917. Moscow, 1992. In Russian.


Rutkiewicz-Hanczewska 2013 – Rutkiewicz-Hanczewska M. Onimic Genology. Proper Name in the Motivational and Communication Ground. Poznań, 2013. In Polish.

 

Superanskaya 1985 – Superanskaya A. V. What is toponymy? Moscow, 1985. In Russian.

 

Terentev 2015 – Terentev E. A. The Renaming of Soviet Toponyms in St. Petersburg: An Analysis of Public Discussions. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2015. Vol. 18. P. 72–85. In Russian.

 

About author

Katarzyna Janik-Borecka
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland,

Institute of Russian and Ukrainian Studies
E-mail: [email protected]

 

For citation:

Janik-Borecka К. Places-Palimpsests of Saint Petersburg and Their Names. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2022. 1 (2). P. 142–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-142-156