Cities in Fiction Cinema: Their Roles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-7-28
Sergey Smirnov
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch
of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
smirnoff1955@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-2023-8855
Abstract
The article discusses the subject and method of urban anthropology. The author believes that the subject of urban anthropology is not reduced to either the applied sociology of the city or to micro-urbanism. The article makes an attempt to highlight a special figure of the urban researcher who comprehends the city in ad hominem categories and understands a person in the categories of the city as a place for him to acquire his own meaning and environment. A distinction is made between the urban classic explorer-observer, the urban onlooker, the flaneur, and the townsman-citizen. The author states that cities, like spaces in general, are never neutral. The city is always inhabited. Regarding the living space, there are always certain ideas of people who live there and comprehend it as their environment. In this sense, there are as many cities as there are images of a city and ways of living in it. The image of the city depends on the way it is represented in a human’s mind. And the creation of the images themselves depends on the routes-paths that the inhabitants of urban spaces, the city inhabitants, are making. The paper introduces an idea of the method used in urban anthropology and humanitarian geography - the theory and practice of drawing cartoids and mental maps. The paper describes the difference between a cartoid and a mental map. A methodological construct of a cartoid is proposed, on which basis such support benchmarks as a path, border, landmark, place, horizon, and route, are introduced. Based on the methodological construct of the cartoid, the article provides the analysis of a pilot survey of modern city representatives and their “cartoids” (on the example of the Novosibirsk Aсademgorodok), which are maps-routes in their habitable urban space.
Keywords: city, urban studies, urban anthropology, city anthropology, mental map, city image, cartoids.
REFERENCES
Abramov 2018 – Abramov R. “Forgotten in the past”: The development of abandoned spaces and the phenomenon of new urban tourism. Microurbanism. City in detail. Moscow, 2018. P. 13–39. In Russian.
Amin, Thrift 2002 – Amin A., Thrift N. The intelligibility of the everyday city. Transl. into Russian. Logos. 2002. 3 (34). P. 1–25.
Amin, Thrift 2017 – Amin A., Thrift N. Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Transl. into Russian. Nizhny Novgorod, 2017.
Benjamin 2019 – Benjamin W. Nine Works. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2019. Brednikova, Zaporozhets 2018 – Brednikova O., Zaporozhets O. Microurbanism. Trap for the city. Microurbanism. The city in details. Moscow, 2018. P. 13–39. In Russian.
Certeau 2008 – de Certeau M. Marches dans la ville . Transl. into Russian. Russian Sociological Review. 2008. Vol. 7. 2. P. 24–38.
Efremenko 2015 – Chicago Sociology School. Ed. by D. V. Efremenko. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2015.
Florida 2014 – Florida R. Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2014.
Glazkov 2013 – Glazkov K. Mental maps: methods of analysis, error, and spatial metrics. Sociology of power. 2013. 3. P. 39–56. In Russian.
Glazkov, Strelnikova 2015 – Glazkov K., Strelnikova A. Mobile methods: movement as part of a research strategy. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2015. 10. P. 79–90. In Russian.
Guallart 2016 – Guallart V. We live in modern times and we need new conceptions. Transl. into Russian. Urban Studies and Practices. 2016. Vol. 1. P. 7–10.
Gutnov, Glazychev 1990 – Gutnov A. E., Glazychev V. L. The world of architecture: The face of the city. Moscow, 1990. In Russian.
Ilf 2020 – Ilf A. Did he walk with me? Ed. by O. Polyakova. Culture. RF. 2020. URL: https://www.culture.ru/materials/169757/neuzheli-on-gulyal-so-mnoi. In Russian.
Ivanova 2018 – Ivanova A. Marsupials. Choreography of urban transport passengers. Microurbanism. The city in detail. Moscow, 2018. P. 70–93. In Russian.
Ivanova, Dietz 2015 – Ivanova V. V., Dietz E. A. Images of the territory in the perception of its inhabitants (on the example of Akademgorodok). Vestnik NSU. 2015. Vol. 15. 4. P. 139–145. In Russian.
Kogan 1990 – Kogan L. B. To be city dwellers. Moscow, 1990. In Russian.
Kogan 1996 – Kogan L. B. Citizens are required! Moscow, 1996. In Russian.
Kuzenbach 2003 – Kusenbach M. Street Phenomenology the Go-along as Ethnographic Research Tool. Ethnography. 2003. Vol. 4 (3). P. 455–485.
Landry 2006 – Landry C. The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2006.
Landry 2008 – Landry C. The Art of City-Making. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2008.
Low 2016 – Low S. M. On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2016.
Löw 2018 – Löw M. Structures of own logic: differences between cities as a conceptual problem. Transl. into Russian. Own logic of cities. New approaches in urbanism. Moscow, 2018. P. 40–66.
Lynch 1982 – Lynch K. The Image of the City. Transl. into Russian by V. L. Glazychev. Moscow, 1982.
Mitin 2017 – Mitin I. I. Mental maps of the city: the history of the concept and a variety of approaches. Urban Studies and Practices. 2017. Vol. 2. 3. P. 64–79. In Russian.
Nekrasov 2009 – Nekrasov V. P. Onlooker notes. München, 2009. In Russian.
Odintsova 2019 – Odintsova A. A. The image of the Academgorodok in the perception of a new generation. Novosibirsk, 2019. In Russian.
Park 2002 – Park R. The City as a Social Laboratory. Transl. into Russian. Russian Sociological Review. 2002. Vol. 2. 3. P. 3–12.
Richardson 2008 – Richardson T. Kaleidoscopic Odesa: History and Place in Contemporary Ukraine. Toronto, Buffalo, London, 2008.
Semenova 2009 – Semenova V. Mapping urban space: basic approaches to visual analysis. Visual anthropology: city memory maps. Moscow, 2009. P. 67–81. In Russian.
Shemelina, Vanina 2012 – Shemelina O. S., Vanina O. E. The image of the city of Novosibirsk in the students’ view. Siberian Pedagogical Journal. 2012. 8. P. 248–254. In Russian.
Shevelev 2017 – Shevelev E. City (without) a man: practices of developing empty and abandoned spaces. Microurbanism. The city in detail. Moscow, 2018. P. 43–63. In Russian.
Smirnov 2004 a – Principles of Good Governance and Urban Governance. Ed. by S. A. Smirnov. Novosibirsk, 2004. In Russian.
Smirnov 2004 b – Smirnov S. A. Human resource development management. Novosibirsk, 2004. In Russian.
Smirnov 2017 – Smirnov S. A. The image of the city: from map to carotid. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2017. 4 (14). P. 28–48. In Russian.
Smirnov 2018 – Smirnov S. A. Anthropoid cartoid as a means of anthropological-logical navigation. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2018. 1 (15). P. 34–48. In Russian.
Smirnov 2019 a – Smirnov S.A. Urban anthropology: between urbanism and everyday life. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2019. 1 (19). P. 13–31. In Russian.
Smirnov 2019 b – Smirnov S. A. Human dimension of city. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2019. 2 (20). P. 13–32. In Russian.
Smirnov 2019 c – Smirnov S. A. City-campus, or Educational space of the city. Methodological construct. Higher education in Russia. 2019. Vol. 28. 4. P. 44–59. In Russian.
Strelnikova 2012 – Strelnikova A. V. Method of biographical walk: interviews in spatial dimension. Modern sociology to modern Russia: Collection of articles in memory of A. O. Kryshtanovsky. Moscow, 2012. P. 665–671. In Russian.
Urry 2012 – Urry J. Mobility. Transl. into Russian by A. V. Lazarev. Moscow, 2012.
Veselkova 2010 – Veselkova N. V. Mental maps of the city: questions of methodology and practice of use. Sociology. 2010. 31. P. 5–29. In Russian.
Zaporozhets 2017 – Zaporozhets O. N. “Mobile methods”: a study of life in motion. Sociology: 4 M. 2017. 44. P. 37–72. In Russian.
Zaporozhets, Lavrinets 2006 – Zaporozhets O., Lavrinets E. Hide and seek, towns and other research games (Urban Studies in search of a fulcrum). Communitas. 2006. 1. P. 5–20. In Russian.
About author
Sergey A. Smirnov
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
E-mail: [email protected]
For citation:
Avanesov S. S. Cities in Fiction Cinema: Their Roles. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2022. 1 (2). P. 43-74.
