Rethinking Yerevan's touristic landscape through social and symbolic spaces

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-117-133

Narine Abgaryan
Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armeniа
[email protected]

ORCID: 0009-0008-2483-1120

 

Harutyun Vermishyan
Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armeniа
[email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0003-2464-0072

 

Mariam Mirzoyan
Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
[email protected]
ORCID: 0009-0002-7210-5138

 

 

ABSTRACT

Urban spaces are complex environments shaped by diverse perspectives and representations. This study explores the relationship between language and space in Yerevan, aiming to enhance our understanding of the city's dynamics. Drawing upon theoretical frameworks from Victor Vakhshtayn, Henri Lefebvre, Kevin Lynch, Edward Glaeser, and David Seamon, the research examines how Yerevan is represented by tourists. Through thematic interviews with tour guides, analysis of tourist information leaflets, and document studies of “Inside Yerevan” maps, the study uncovers two primary challenges: geographical limitation and one-dimensional representation. To address these challenges, a multifaceted approach is proposed, including diversifying tour routes, integrating social and symbolic spaces in tour narratives, and promoting authentic local experiences. The “Inside Yerevan” map offers a promising solution by highlighting local favorites and lesser-known gems. Ultimately, by embracing diversity and authenticity, Yerevan can create a more sustainable tourism model that benefits both visitors and residents.

 

KEYWORDS: urban space, language-space relationship, touristic representations, social and symbolic spaces, tour narratives, authentic local experience.

 

 

References

 

Ashworth, G., & Page, S. J. (2011). Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes. Tourism Management, 32(1), 1–15.

 

Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Columbia University Press.

 

Boisen, M., Terlouw, K., & Van Gorp, B. (2011). The selective nature of place branding and the layering of spatial identities. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(2), 135–147.

 

Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology of Politics. Socio-Logos. (in Russian).

 

Cohen, E. (2013). A phenomenology of tourist experiences. In The Sociology of Tourism (pp. 90–112). Routledge.

 

Crang, M., & Thrift, N. (2000). Thinking space. Vol. 9. Routledge.

 

Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. B. (1993). The measurement of destination image: An empirical assessment. Journal of Travel Research, 31(4), 3–13.

 

Glaeser, E. (2012). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier (Reprint edition). Penguin Books.

 

Glaeser, E., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2000). Consumer city. NBER Working Papers. Art. 7790. https://www.nber.org/papers/w7790.

 

Goffman, E. (2023). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 450–459). Routledge.

 

Gottdiener, M. (1995). Postmodern semiotics: Material culture and the forms of postmodern life. Blackwell.

Harvey, D. (1987). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

 

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.

 

Karp, D. A., Stone, G. P., Yoels, W. C., & Dempsey, N. P. (2015). Being urban: A sociology of city life. Praeger.

 

Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding, 1, 58–73.

 

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1949). The American Soldier – An Expository Review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 13(3), 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1086/266089.

 

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.

 

Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. University of Minnesota Press.

 

Lynch, K. (1964). The image of the city. MIT Press.

 

Ma, Y., Li, G., Xie, H., & Zhang, H. (2018). City profile: Using smart data to create digital urban spaces. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 4, 75–82.

 

Petrosyan, S. (2016). The transformation of Yerevan’s urban landscape after independence. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 97, 2–4.

 

Reeves, R. (2017). Reality in advertising. https://jonduke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/reality-in-advertising.pdf.

 

Schmidt, S., & Németh, J. (2010). Space, place and the city: Emerging research on public space design and planning. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 453–457.

 

Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.

 

Seamon, D. (2012). Place, place identity, and phenomenology: A triadic interpretation based on JG Bennett’s systematics. The Role of Place Identity in the Perception, Understanding, and Design of Built Environments, 3–21.

 

Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.

 

Tadevosyan, A. (2010). The urban culture of Yerevan. Part 1: The transformations of the Social Culture in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Yerevan. Vem. Pan-Armenian journal, 4.

 

Vermishyan, H., Balasanyan, S., Grigoryan, O., & Kerobyan, S. (2015). Local identities in Yerevan: Structures of urban space. YSU Publishing House.

 

Vermishyan, H. (2021). Ideological and cultural practices in the Soviet housing space: The case of allocation and obtaining of apartments in Yerevan. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 13(2), 23–38.

 

Wiedmann, F., & Salama, A. M. (2019). Mapping Lefebvre’s theory on the production of space to an integrated approach for sustainable urbanism. In The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society. (pp. 346–354). Routledge.

 

Zenker, S., Braun, E., & Petersen, S. (2017). Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors. Tourism Management, 58, 15–27.

 

Zukin, S. (1993). Landscapes of power: From Detroit to Disney World. University of California Press.

 

Vakhshtayn, V. (2014). Reassembling the City: Between Language and Space. Sociology of Power, 2, 9–38. (in Russian).

 

 

Information about the authors
Narine M. Abgaryan
PhD Student, Lecturer
Chair of Service, Faculty of Geography and Geology
Yerevan State University
1, Alex Manoogian St., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
ORCID: 0009-0008-2483-1120
е-mail: [email protected]

 

Harutyun R. Vermishyan
PhD (Sociology),
Head of Chair of Theory and History of Sociology
Yerevan State University
1, Alex Manoogian St., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
ORCID: 0000-0003-2464-0072
Scopus AuthorID: 57189257650
e-mail: [email protected]

 

Mariam Sh. Mirzoyan
Lecturer
Chair of Theory and History of Sociology
Yerevan State University
1, Alex Manoogian St., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
ORCID: 0009-0002-7210-5138
e-mail: [email protected]

For citation:
Abgaryan, N., Vermishyan, H., & Mirzoyan, M. (2024). Rethinking Yerevan's touristic landscape through social and symbolic spaces. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 4(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-117-133