Published

15.06.2022

Issue

№ 1 (2022): URBIS ET ORBIS

Section

Articles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-43-74

Sergey S. Avanesov
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Russia
E-mail: [email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0002-1081-4871

 

Abstract

 

The question of the possibility of exploring the city by means of cinematography is investigated in this article. I am making a preliminary description and structuring of the on-screen presentation of the city here, showing that this presentation is carried out through the formation of its non-verbal image. Using the example of three Soviet films of thethaw period, I show how it is possible to comprehend the city in its human dimension with the help of cinematographic tools. Combinations of a general plan and immersion in the thick of events, documentary and utopian character, structure of urban space and spontaneous movement of heroes, individual mood and social “atmosphere”, place and time form an integral artistic image of the city on the screen. The cinematic image of the urban space appears as a visual projection of the complex inner life of its inhabitants. Urban modernity contains and represents the history of a place, and the characters of films in such a multidimensional modernity gradually become themselves: their life turns into a biography. At the same time, the city is enriched with these biographies, forever incorporating them into its history. The mutual dependence of the city and the person is conveyed using optical metaphors, the construction and design of mise-en-scenes, the location and movement of the camera, visual allusions to mythological and ideological constructs, the mutual recall of verbal and non-verbal texts and other artistic techniques, which together form a kind of cinematic language for presentation and analysis of urban space as a special cultural chronotope. Thus, “urban” cinema acts as a specific paradigm of urban studies that allows one to explore the city by constructing its screen image.

 

Keywords: city in the fiction cinema, semiotics of the city, urban studies, Soviet cinema, Moscow at the cinema, Marlen Khutsiev, Georgiy Daneliya.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Abramov 2009 Abramov R. Poetics of everyday life of the 1970s in the film “A tram goes through the city”: a nostalgic essay. Visual anthropology. City memory cards. Ed. by P. Romanov, E. Iarskaia-Smirnova. Moscow, 2009. P. 143169. In Russian.

 

Avanesov 2020 – Avanesov S. S. City as a Cultural Myth. Myth in history, politics, culture. Materials of the IV International Scientific Interdisciplinary Conference. Ed. by A. V. Stavitsky. Sevastopol, 2020. P. 5761. In Russian.

 

Balandina 2014 – Balandina N. P. City and House in Russian and French Cinema of the 1960s. Moscow, 2014. In Russian.

 

Baranov 1980 Baranov N. N. Silhouette of the City. Leningrad, 1980. In Russian.

 

Bernatonite, Avanesov 2020 Bernatonite A. K., Avanesov S. S. The Semantics of Lithuanian Urban and Rural Landscapes in Soviet Children Cinema. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ (Praxema). Journal of visual semiotics. 2020. 1 (23). P. 221231. In Russian.

 

Borin 2010 Borin A. G. Factory Town: to the Problem of Developing a General Layout of Stalinsk of 1936. Tomsk State University Journal. 2010. 331. P. 7576. In Russian.

 


Deleuze 2013 Deleuze G. Cinéma. Transl. into Russian by B. Skuratov. Moscow, 2013.

 

Fedorov, Koval 2009 – Fedorov V. V., Koval I. M. Mythosymbolism of Architecture. Moscow, 2009. In Russian.

 

Ikonnikov 1979 Ikonnikov A. V. Architectural ensemble. Moscow, 1979. In Russian.

 

Kincharova 2009 Kincharova A. “Welcome to the City of Deception”: Representation of St. Petersburg in the Film “Walk” by A. Uchitel. Visual Anthropology. City memory cards. Ed. by P. Romanov, E. Iarskaia-Smirnova. Moscow, 2009. P. 170188. In Russian.

 

Kovalov 2008 – Kovalov O. The fourth meaning. “Zastava Ilyicha”: a hypothesis of reading the film text. Art of Cinema. 2008. 10–11. URL: https://kinoart.ru/texts/chetvertyy-smysl-zastava-ilicha-gipoteza-prochteniya-kinoteksta. In Russian.

 

Kurbatova 2004 – Kurbatova X. Time in the figurative structure of Marlen Khutsiev’s film “Zastava Ilyicha”. Papers of film studies. 2004. 68. P. 237–263. URL: http://www.ki-nozapiski.ru/ru/article/sendvalues/10/. In Russian.

 

Leybovich 2016 – Leybovich O. L. Socialist factory in a collective memory of the citizen (on the materials of Perm). Ural Historical Journal. 2016. 3 (52). P. 33–42. In Russian.

 

Matizen 2006 – Matizen V. E. Cities on the Screen. Russian Expert Review. 2006. 2 (16). URL: https://archipelag.ru/agenda/povestka/evolution/obrazi_goroda/cities_on_screen/. InRussian.

 

Nikolaev 1937 – Nikolaev I. S. Factory and City. Problems of architecture. Ed. by Yu. K. Milonov. Vol. 2. Book. 2. Moscow, 1937. P. 285–317. In Russian.

 

Pålsson 2019 – Pålsson K. How to Design Humane Cities. Transl. into Russian. Berlin, 2019.

 

Salnikova 2009 – Salnikova E. Evolution of the visual series in Soviet cinema from the 1930s to the 1980s. Visual Anthropology. Modes of Visibility under Socialism. Ed. by E. Iarskaia-Smirnova, P. Romanov. Moscow, 2009. P. 335–358. In Russian.

 

Simyan 2019 – Simyan T. S. Musical and carnival space of Old Tiflis (on the example of Vano Khojabekyan, Vagharshak Elibekyan, Agasi Aivazyan). ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2019. 2 (20). P. 63–80. In Russian.

 

Smirnov 2009 – Smirnov I. P. Video Sequence. Historical Semantics of Cinema. St. Petersburg, 2009. In Russian.

 

Temlyakova 2015 – Temlyakova A. S. From Sverdlovsk to Yekaterinburg: the Image of the City in Cinema. Čelovek v mire kulʹtury [Man in the world of culture ]. 2015. 3. P. 53–59. In Russian.

 

Ursulyak 2014 – Ursulyak S. V. Foreword. Balandina N. P. City and House in Russian and French Cinema of the 1960s. Moscow, 2014. P. 5–7. In Russian.

 

Vinogradov 2013 – Vinogradov V. V. Moscow – old and new. Cities in cinema. Moscow, 2013. P. 108–129. In Russian.

 

About author

Sergey S. Avanesov
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Russia

E-mail: [email protected]

 

For citation:

Avanesov S. S. Cities in Fiction Cinema: Their Roles. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City.
2022.
1 (2). P. 43-74.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-43-74