The image of Yerevan in the context of postcolonial discourse in Yuri Karabchievsky's “Yearning for Armenia”

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-78-92

Ani Petrs-Bartsumian
Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
[email protected]
ORCID: 0000-0002-2720-6522

ABSTRACT

Armenia has been incorporated into Russia or under its “protectorate” for two centuries. Throughout this period, a substantial body of texts about Armenia has emerged in prose and poetry, highlighting the distinctive “Armenian text” as a metatext within Russian literature. However, Yuri Karabchievsky’s novella “Longing for Armenia” (1978), which could not be published in Russia until the times of Perestroika, is considered the first work to explore Armenia's colonial status and contain key motifs of post-colonial text: loss of territories, loss of history and culture, language, etc. The impact of Armenization is evident, notably in the capital city, Yerevan, portrayed as a space marked by impermanence, foreignness, contradiction, and negligence. An analysis of the novella’s central themes, characters, thoughts, and emotions related to Yerevan leads to the conclusion that Yerevan is inherently “non-Armenian,” bearing a profound colonial imprint in organizational structure and spatial symbolism, primarily in its architectural aspect. Furthermore, this article places significant emphasis on Soviet symbols and presence in Yerevan, as well as the role of the Armenian language in the city’s culture and space. Yerevan emerges as a city harboring a melancholy for a lost and estranged ancient past, whose specifics remain elusive, partly due to the suppression of the language of that past. It also yearns for a present and future in which Armenia has not forfeited its culture and history. Despite Yerevan’s failure to conform to the status of the capital of an ancient nation, the changes occurring in the city during the protagonist's lifetime in Karabchievsky’s novella offer hope for the revival of such a Yerevan and Armenia – longed for by the novella’s main characters and cherished by many.

KEYWORDS: postcolonial literature, the image of Yerevan, «Yearning for Armenia», Yuri Karabchievsky, «Armenian text».

References

Abramian, L. A. (2010). Yerevan: Memory and forgetting in the organization of post-Soviet urban space city. Anthropological Forum, 12, 248–271. (In Russian).

Avetyan, A. A. (2022). Some socio-economic problems of a modern city and ways to solve them (by the example of Yerevan). Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 1(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1 (2)-101-118. (In Russian).

Bagration-Mukhraneli, I. L. (2016). Representation of Georgia and the Caucasus in the 19th to early 20th century Russian literature. Doctoral dissertation abstracts for the degree of Doctor of Philological Sciences. (In Russian).

Belukova, V. (2015). Existential motives in the city prose of Yuriy Karabchievskiy. Bulletin MSRU. Russian Philology, 6, 75–80. (In Russian).

Belukova, V. B. (2016). The «urban» prose of Y. Karabchievsky: The author and the hero. Pushkin Readings – 2016. Artistic Strategies of Classical and New Literature: Genre, Author, Text. Proceedings of the XXI International Scientific Conference. (pp. 290–296). Pushkin Leningrad State University. (In Russian).

Breeva, T. N. (2017). Postcolonial discourse in contemporary Russian Literature. Philology and Culture, 2(48), 139–145. (In Russian).

Daudov, A., & Mamysheva, E. P. (2011). On the history of alphabet Latinization in the USSR. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. History, 2, 7–12. (In Russian).

Kalashyan, S. (2007). The memorial complex holds no hidden numerological symbolism. http://news.genocide.ru/2007/11/29/449.htm. (In Russian).

Karabchievsky, Y. (1988 a). Yearning for Armenia. Literary Armenia, 7, 56–88. (In Russian).

Karabchievsky, Y. (1988 b). Yearning for Armenia. Literary Armenia, 8, 65–91. (In Russian).

Karabchievsky, Y. (1991). Yearning for Home. Slovo. (In Russian).

Margaryan, Ye. (2021). Urban problems of Yerevan: Thoughts about the unthinkable. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 1, 37–76.
https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2021-1-37-76. (In Russian).

Nerler, P. (2015). «Journey to Armenia» and Osip Mandelstam's Journey to Armenia: An attempt at reconstruction. Znamya, 11, 123–152. (In Russian).

Rivera-Lutap, J. A., & Castillo, J. B. A. (2023). From power to architecture: An analysis on the identity transformation of Tagaytay people’s park in the sky through edifice complex and democratization theory. City Territ Archit, 10(31), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-023-00217-1.

Shаfranskaya, E. (2016). Anti-Soviet discourse in the travelog «Longing for Armenia» by Yuri Karabchievsky. Travelogs: Reception and Interpretation. (pp. 111–124). Svoyo Publishing. (In Russian).

Shafranskaya, E. (2017). The uncensored Armenia of Yuri Karabchievsky. Russian Language in Armenia, 6(109), 39–44. (In Russian).

Shаfranskaya, E. F. (2019). Colonial and postcolonial literature: Terminology and content. Philology and Culture, 1(55), 203–211. (In Russian).

Shafranskaya, E. F. (2022). «The Armenian text: Job’s Children». Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 19(3), 511–520. (In Russian).

Shapoval, S. (2018). Conversations at the turn of the Millennium. New Literary Observer. (In Russian).

Shuvaeva-Petrosyan, E. A. (2018). The psychological aspect of the perception of the Armenian national thinking and linguistic phenomenon in the story by Yuri Karabchievsky «Toska po Armenii». Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science, 3, 69–73. (In Russian).

Shuvaeva-Petrosyan, E. A. (2021). The Armenian alphabet in the perception of O. Mandelstam, A. Bitov, and Y. Karabchievsky. Actual Problems of the Culture of Modern Russian Speech. Materials of the 15th All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation. (pp. 144–147). Armavir State Pedagogical University. (In Russian).

Stepanyan, A. A., & Simyan, T. S. (2016). Yerevan as a semiotic text (the experience of reconstruction of the “Beginning” and “End” of Mashtots Avenue). Critique and Semiotics, 16, 6–16. (In Russian).

Thompson, E. M. (2000). Imperial knowledge: Russian literature and colonialism. Greenwood Press.

Thompson, E. M. (2007). Imperial knowledge: Russian literature and colonialism. Perekrestki, 1–2, 32–75. (In Russian).

Vasilyan, V. O. (2023). The image of the city in Armenia: Anthropological perspective. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 3(1), 82–96. https://doi:10.34680/urbis-2023-3(1)-82-96.

Vermishyan, H., & Barseghyan, L. (2022). Yerevan Center Urban Parks and Garden Squares: Places for people, places of meanings. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 1(2), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-157-184.

Information about the author

Ani Petrs-Bartsumian
PhD student
The Chair of History and Literary Criticism of
Modern Armenian Literature
Yerevan State University
1, Alex Manoogian St., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
ORCID: 0000-0002-2720-6522
Scopus AuthorID: 58102961700
e-mail: [email protected]

For citation:
Petrs-Bartsumian, А. (2024). The image of Yerevan in the context of postcolonial discourse in Yuri Karabchievsky's “Yearning for Armenia”. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 4(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-78-92