DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2025-5(2)-263-282
Analyzing the concept “cultural code (of a сity)” in foreign studies
Anna Vandysheva
Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, Russia
[email protected]
ORCID: 0000-0002-5714-617X
ABSTRACT
The relevance of the research is due to the growing interest in the problems of urban identity, sustainable development, and branding of urban space, where understanding the deep mechanisms of coding, on the one hand, and the manifestation of culture in the semiotic aspect, on the other, is becoming a key factor in effective management. The city's cultural code is an ambiguous phenomenon, characterized by multidimensional approaches and content that is sometimes contradictory. The purpose of this work is a systematic review of the research of foreign scientists published in foreign scientific sources, a critical analysis, and a structuring of the scientific views of foreign authors in the field of studying the cultural code in general and the cultural code of the city, in particular, with an emphasis on its visual and anthropological dimensions. A representative base has been established for further comparative analysis of the data obtained alongside the results of Russian scientists' scientific achievements, followed by conceptualization, parameterization, and construction of a structured, integrated model of the “cultural code of the city”. The results of studying the works of foreign scientists allow us to identify three main trends in scientific research in the field under study: the focus on the theorization of the notion/concept of the cultural code in its pure form, without correlating it with urbanism, in isolation from the urban context; field, empirical studies of cultural codes of specific cities, which have apparent practical significance, are often focused on solving autonomous practical and managerial tasks of urban development, and are not of a complex nature; works whose authors use an interdisciplinary approach to studying the cultural code of a city, including using modern technologies, while the research results have different theoretical potential. Many studies are devoted to the problem field, which essentially corresponds to the concept of the cultural code of the city, however, foreign authors use slightly different terminology (“cultural landscape”, “urban imaginary”, “branding of the city”, “cultural map of the city”, “cognitive/mental map of the city”, etc.). The results of the study state that the city's cultural code is an open, living, multi-layered system, a kind of genomic semantic convolution. Its visual segment consists of key symbols, objects, events, texts, narratives, spaces, landscapes, mental (cognitive) maps, cultural and spatial tags, and many others that manifest and transmit meaningful and conceptual information. The cultural code, among other things, shapes a set of urban behaviors, values, attitudes, beliefs, and meanings.
KEYWORDS: cultural code of the city, urban culture, visual dominance, cultural landscape, cultural and historic urban, landscape, cultural mapping, cultural DNA.
References
(de) Abreu Santos, V. Á., & (van der) Borg, J. (2023). Cultural mapping tools and co-design process: a content analysis to layering perspectives on the creative production of space. Sustainability, 15(6), 5335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065335
Almusaed, A., & Almssad, A. (2020). City phenomenon between urban structure and composition. Sustainability in Urban Planning and Design.
IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90443
Alperytė, I., & Išoraitė, M. (2019). Developing a city brand. Journal of Intercultural Management, 11(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2019-0022
Avanesov, S. S. (2018). Urban space as anthropological phenomenon. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2(16), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2018-2-10-31 (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S., & Fedotova, N. G. (2022). The city: in search of identity. Alethea. (In Russian).
Bala, H. A. (2016). Landmarks or structural element in urban space as signs. Current Urban Studies, 4, 409–429. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2016.44027
Bayrakdaroğlu, F. (2017). Management of a city brand: an examination on three stakeholders’ attitudes. In Advancing Insights on Brand Management. InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69458
Berger, A. (2008). Clotaire Rapaille, the culture code: an ingenious way to understand why people around the world live and buy as they do. Society, 45(3), 316–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9083-7
Bolzonella, F. (2016). Urban culture: definition and contextualization. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305936766_Urban_Culture_Definition_and_Contextualization
Fedotova, N. G. (2022). The cultural code of the city. Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, 13(4), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2022-4-1 (In Russian).
Gudova, M. Yu., & Yuan, M. (2022). The concept of “cultural code”: levels of meaning. Intellect. Innovations. Investments, 4, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2022-4-151 (In Russian).
Guzhova, I. V. (2014). Town cultural code visualization in image communication with new media technologies help (semiotic approach). Historical, Philosophical, Political, and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2-2(2), 45–49. (In Russian).
Harvey, D. (2006). The right to the city. In R. Scholar (Ed.), Divided Cities: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 2003 (pp. 83–103). Oxford University Press.
Januchta-Szostak, A. (2010). The role of public visual art in urban space recognition. In Cognitive Maps. InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/7120
Jones, C., & Svejenova, S. (2017). The architecture of city identities: a multimodal study of Barcelona and Boston. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 54B, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2017000054B007
Kuznetsova, A. V., & Petrulevich, I. A. (2019). Urban text: semiosis of the cultural code. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 11, 89–95. (In Russian).
Li, Y., Hsü, P., Hao, G., Sun, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). City brand image building and its impact on the psychological capital of new entrepreneurs following cultural construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 717303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717303
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Manoharan, A. P., Hohensinn, L., & Wu, H. C. (2024). Public branding in the digital age: an empirical investigation of U.S. Cities. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2311385
McQuire, S. (2023). Learning from street view: lessons in urban visuality. In L. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual and Multimodal Urban Sociology, Part A (pp. 141–160). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1047-00422023000018A006
Miles, M. (2007). Cities and Cultures. Routledge.
Ng., J. T.-D., Hu, X., & Que, Y. (2022). Towards multi-modal evaluation of eye-tracked Virtual heritage environment. In LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 451–457). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506881
Rapaille, C. (2006). The culture code: an ingenious way to understand why people around the world live and buy as they do. Broadway Books.
Rausell-Köster, P., Ghirardi, S., Sanjuán, J., Francesco, Molinari F. & Abril, B. (2022). Cultural Experiences in the framework of “cultural cities”: measuring the socioeconomic impact of culture in urban performance. City, Territory and Architecture, 9, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00189-8
Sabatini, F., & Trimarchi, M. (2020). Challenging spaces and formats of culture in the city: highlights on the future of cultural heritage management. European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 10(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2023v10iss1-article-2
Seliger, M., & Mika 'Lumi' Tuomola. (2012). Cities as sets: narrative eye to urban design. Northern World Mandate: Towards Open & Participative Cities (May 2012, Helsinki) (pp. 1–14). Aalto University School of Art and Design.
Shestakov, A. (2008). Cultural code concept in contemporary world. Norwegian Open Research Archives. https://core.ac.uk/search?q=authors:(Shestakov,%20Alexander%20Alexandrovich)
Simo, Zh/, & Ming-Yu, H., & Huang, Y.-Ch. (2022). Teaching research on the application of cultural DNA to the design of cultural and creative products. ICDEL '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 211–216). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543321.3543356
Taylor, K. (2015). Cities as cultural landscapes. In F. Bandarin & R. Van Oers (Eds.), Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage (pp. 179–202). Wiley-Blackwell.
Taylor, K., & Verdini, G. (2022). Management planning for cultural heritage: places and their significance. Routledge.
Van Oers, R. (2010). Managing cities and the historic urban landscape initiative – an introduction. In R. Van Oers & S. Haraguchi (Eds.), UNESCO World Heritage Papers 27: Managing Historic Cities (pp. 7–17). UNESCO.
Zenker, S., & Braun, E. (2010). Branding a city: a conceptual approach for place branding and place brand management. In The 39th Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy. EMAC 2010: The Six Senses: The Essentials of Marketing – Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark. Copenhagen Business School.
Information about the author
Anna V. Vandysheva
Cand. Sci. (Philology),
Associate Professor
of the Foreign Languages Department
Head of the Forensic Linguistics Centre
Kuban State Technological University
2 “A” Bld., 2, Moskovskaya St., Krasnodar,
350072, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0002-5714-617X
e-mail: [email protected]
For citation:
Vandysheva, А. V. (2025). Analyzing the concept “cultural code (of a сity)” in foreign studies. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 5(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2025-5(2)-263-282