Cityscape as a cultural value

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-5-22

Sergey Avanesov
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia
[email protected]
ORCID: 0000-0002-1081-4871

ABSTRACT

The article analyzes cityscapes from the point of view of their value for the formation and preservation of the spatial and temporal unity of the cultural landscape of the historical city. The author distinguishes between cityscapes (urban views) as images of any urban location or composition and cityscapes (urban views) as configurations of architectural and other material spaces that we can observe in a real urban environment. The cityscape is defined in this article as a freely perceived, “readable” architectural urban composition, having high artistic significance and “supporting” the surrounding urban tissue, being the most important factor in the activity of citizens and guests of the city, and is also “responsible” for a specific identity urban space as a whole. A cityscape usually consists of several spatial patterns. The space of a traditional Russian city is formed as a system of urban views that reveal both its geographical design and its sacred semantics. Damage (destruction) of one or more cityscapes leads to degradation of the urban environment as a whole. The author defines the main reasons for the destruction of cityscapes and determines the consequences of these processes. The author concludes that cityscapes (urban views), as spatial structures that form the supporting frame of the visual environment, are a fundamental part of the entire cultural structure called ‘the city’. The system of urban views carries several integration functions: logistic, aesthetic, semiotic, local-historical, cultural-identification, and social. The system of cityscapes directly reveals the specifics of the city. The preservation of cityscapes as fundamental pillars of the urban environment and as cultural heritage values ensures the actuality of the historical past, the spatiotemporal unity of an identical urban environment, and also instills in citizens a sense of belonging to their city, which exists only in a ‘long time’ of culture.

KEYWORDS: historical city, visual environment, cityscapes, visual frame of the city, cultural heritage.

References

Alisov, D. A. (2020). Cultural landscape of the city, or Some ways of fixing historical memory in the urban environment. In D. A. Alisov & I. A. Selezneva (Eds.), Cultural Landscapes of the Modern City. (pp. 4–21). Russian Heritage Institute. (In Russian).

Antsiferov, N. P. (1922). Soul of St. Petersburg. Brockhaus & Efron Publishing House. (In Russian).

Arnheim, R. (1984). The dynamics of architectural form (V. L. Glazychev, Trans.). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Avanesov, S. S. (2023). Visual patterns of the urban environment and local identity. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4(38), 14–36. (In Russian).

Becker, A. (1972). On the preservation of urban planning systems of the past. In Theory and Practice of Restoration Work. Part 3. (pp. 21–24). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Bondarenko, I. A. (2017). Theory in the history of architecture and urban planning. Kolo. (In Russian).

Bunin, A., & Kruglova, T. (1935). Urban complex in Renaissance architecture. In A. I. Lebedev (Ed.), Questions of Architecture. (pp. 58–91). OGIZ, IZOGIZ (In Russian).

Fischer, S. A. (2005). Review: Ben Highmore, Cityscapes: Cultural Readings in the Material and Symbolic City (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). 178 pp.

The Literary London Journal. Literary London: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Representation of London, 3(2). URL: http://literarylondon.org/londonjournal/september2005/fischer.html.

Gepting, E. L. (2023). From Khutyn to Diez: Everyday life of Novgorod in the artistic representation of two eras. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4(38), 190–205. (In Russian).

Golovneva, E. V., & Martishina, N. I. (2021). Vladivostok on view postcards from the collection of B. V. Avgustovsky. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 1, 91–105. (In Russian).

Harvey, D. (2019). Social justice and the city (E. Gerasimova, Trans.). NLO. (In Russian). Ilyin, M. A. (1963). Fundamentals of understanding architecture. Publishing house of the USSR Academy of Arts. (In Russian).

Kharlamov, N. (2008). Cityscapes: real and imaginary. Blue sofa, 12, 166–172. (In Russian).

Kolesnikova, D. A., & Savchuk, V. V. (2015). Visual ecology as a discipline. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 10, 41–50. (In Russian).

Krasheninnikov, A. (2018). Frame, tissue, and plasma. Protected by the State, 6, 66–67. (In Russian).

Lavrenova, O. A. (2021). “The seamy side of the city”: marginal landscapes and contemporary visual culture. The Art and Science of Television, 17(2), 61–87.

Lefebvre, H. (2023). Le Droit à la ville (D. Savosin, Trans.). Journal of Economic Sociology, 24(1), 55–70. (In Russian).

Mokeev, G. Ya. (1975). Features of originality in the structures of the cities of the eastern and western Slavs. In Architectural Heritage. Vol. 23. (pp. 3–13). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Reizen, O. (Ed.). (2013). Cities in cinema. Kanon+. (In Russian).

Shapinskaya, E. N. (2016). Cultural heritage in (post)modern cityscape: Transformation or destruction? Izvestia of Saratov University. (N. S.). Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 16(4), 423–430. (In Russian).

Tonev, L. (1973). Composition of a modern city. (N. Mateev, Trans.). The Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.

Voronin, N. N. (1967). Vladimir. Bogolyubovo. Suzdal. Yuryev-Polsky. Iskusstvo. (In Russian).

Yadav, N., & Shrutimita, M. (2023). Cityscapes and social issues: A critical examination of cities in documentary film. Media Education, 19(4), 581–588.

Information about the author
Sergey S. Avanesov
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor
Director of the Research and Educational
Centre for Humanitarian Urbanistics
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
41, Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya St.,
Veliky Novgorod, 173003, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0002-1081-4871
Web of Science ResearcherID: V-5869-2018
Scopus AuthorID: 55270461000
e-mail: [email protected]

For citation:
Avanesov, S. S. (2024). Cityscape as a cultural value. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 4(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-5-22