Public art in the historical city: Visualizing the local cultural code

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-23-38

 

Elizaveta Speshilova
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia
[email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0002-7859-3526

 

 

 ABSTRACT

The article analyses public art within the framework of the cultural approach – as a form of visualization of the city’s cultural code. The author examines the variants of public art comprehension existing in the Russian academic discourse and identifies the two most common approaches to the interpretation of art in the public space. According to the first approach, public art is interpreted as “commissioned” art, which is an instrument of the state’s ideological policy, and is therefore evaluated negatively. According to the second approach, public art is understood in a less evaluative and more meaningful way, emphasizing the variability of artistic practices existing within it, their focus on communication with society, participation of residents, and reflection of locally significant meanings. The article emphasizes the commemorative functions of public art and comprehends its role in the actualization of the city’s cultural memory and representation of urban identity. The author explores what historical, cultural, and mythological narratives are depicted on the murals in Veliky Novgorod, created within the framework of the All-Russian Street Art Festival “Pages of History” (2019–2023). The article proposes to categorize Novgorod murals into the following thematic groups: 1) genius loci; 2) historical subjects; 3) myths and legends; 4) cultural heritage; 5) natural objects; 6) modern heroes. Art in Veliky Novgorod’s public spaces, especially located in typical Soviet districts, serves to individualize the urban environment and create new points of attraction for the city dwellers. Murals have become part of new excursion routes that run both through the symbolic city center and the city outskirts. The author argues that the subjects represented on the murals are authentic for Veliky Novgorod, contribute to the formation of local identity, enhance the imagery of the urban environment, and emphasize the uniqueness of the Novgorod cultural landscape.

 

KEYWORDS: urban studies, public art, cultural code, historical city, urban identity, Veliky Novgorod, street art, cultural memory.

 

 

References

Akhmatova, A. (1998). Collected works in six volumes. Vol. 1. Poems 1904–1941. Ellis Lak. (In Russian).

 

Assmann, J. (2004). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen (M. M. Sokol’skaya, Trans.). Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. (In Russian).

 

Bogomyakov, V. G., & Chistyakova, M. G. (2014). Public art in the context of identity. Tyumen State University Herald. Philosophy, 10, 183–190. (In Russian).

 

Fedotova, N. G. (2022). The cultural code of the city. Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, 13(4), 10–24. (In Russian).

 

Fedotova, N. G. (2023). Cultural memory of the city: Features of representing the narratives of local patriotism in the urban environment. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie – Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 50, 153–165. (In Russian).

 

Gepting, E. L. (2022). Painting of Novgorod courtyards as a form of amateur creative activity of citizens. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 2(3), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-2(3)-126-135. (In Russian).

 

Kartseva, E.A. (2023). Visual image of the city and urban communication by means of public art: Russian experience. Nauka Televidenya — The Art and Science of Television, 19(1), 13–78. https://doi.org/10.30628/1994-9529-2023-19.1-13-78. (In Russian).

 

Kartseva, E. A., & Zvyagintseva, M. L. (2020). Public art: Terminological approaches and identification criteria. Art & Cult, 37(11), 58–73. (In Russian).

 

Korableva, A. V. (2018). Problem of conceptual differentiation in street art. In K. A. Kuxo (Ed.), The Aesthetics of Street Art. (pp. 10–17). SPbSUITD. (In Russian).

 

Kuxo, K. A. (Ed.). (2018). The aesthetics of street art. SPbSUITD. (In Russian).

 

Maevskaya, M. E. (2022). Features of the traditions of monumental art in the space of the 21st century city. Contemporary World’s Architecture, 18(1), 49–69. (In Russian).

 

Petrov, N. V. (2019). Local text, folklore and public art in an oil single-industry city: Almetyevsk. Urban Folklore & Anthropology, II(3–4), 74–105. (In Russian).

 

Pilikin, D. G. (2018). Terminology of street art. Vocabulary definition. In K. A. Kuxo (Ed.), The Aesthetics of Street Art. (pp. 4–9). SPbSUITD. (In Russian).

 

Popov, I. Yu. (2014). “Lake rule” and other regularities in the distribution of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera Margaritifera. Transactions of Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Science, 2, 126–139. (In Russian).

 

Pulikova, I. V. (Ed.). (2022). Public art vs city: Dialogue or confrontation? The State Institute for Art Studies. (In Russian).

 

Pulikova, I. V. (2022). Public art vs city: Transformation of the conflict? In I. V. Pulikova (Ed.), Public art vs city: Dialogue or confrontation? (pp. 5–15). The State Institute for Art Studies. (In Russian).

 

Savitskaya, A. (2022). Non-public public art. Artistic strategies in the public space of Nizhny Novgorod in the 2010s. In I. V. Pulikova (Ed.), Public art vs city: Dialogue or confrontation? (pp. 111–118). The State Institute for Art Studies. (In Russian).

Sefer, K. E. (2022 a). Actual commemorative art practices (on example of public art). Gumanitarnyye Vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 1(41), 91–103. (In Russian).

 

Sefer, K. E. (2022 b). Urban art and public art: comparative characteristics. Culture and Сivilization, 12(1А), 49–58. (In Russian).

 

Shlykova, O. V. (2021). Digital practices of public art: «Smart» city communication strategies. Culture and Arts Herald, 3(67), 124–134. (In Russian).

 

Speshilova, E. (2023). Urban imaginary: City image and media space. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 5(3), 35–54. (In Russian).

 

Speshilova, E. I., & Avanesov, S. S. (2023). Visual structure of the urban environment and the cultural code concept. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ (Praxema). Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4(38), 221–238. (In Russian).

 

Trubina, E. (2018). Street art in non-capital urban centres: between exploiting commercial appeal and expressing social concerns. Cultural Studies, 32(5), 676–703.

 

Veits, M. E. (2012). Pubic art as a form of dialogue between artist and citizens (the case of “Critical Mass” public art project). The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 10(1), 95– 108. (In Russian).

 

Vilchinskaya-Butenko, M. E. (2022). Modes of visualization of urban art: street art vs public art. Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 47, 18–34. (In Russian).

 

Information about the author
Elizaveta I. Speshilova
Master of Philosophy
Research Fellow of the Research and Educational
Centre for Humanitarian Urbanistics
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
41, Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya St.,
Veliky Novgorod, 173003, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0002-7859-3526
Web of Science ResearcherID: AAH-4757-2019
Scopus AuthorID: 56786229400
e-mail: [email protected]

 

For citation:
Speshilova, E. I. (2024). Public art in the historical city: Visualizing the local cultural code. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 4(1), 23–38.  https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2024-4(1)-23-38