Kiev of the Soviet-Era from Parajanov’s Point of View: “Kiev Frescoes”

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2021-1-119-141

 

Tigran Simyan
Yerevan State University, Armenia
[email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0001-9534-3505

Abstract

 

The article analyzes Sergey Parajanov’s habitus and Parajanov’s vision of the Kiev urban space based on the film script ”Kiev frescoes”. Using the example of the screenplay and screen test “Kiev frescoes”, the article investigates the urban landscape of Kiev and presents the “spirit” of the city at the level of the objective world, everyday life, and celebration. Specifically, I argue that Sergei Parajanov, in the Newspeak of visual signs, through spatial syntagmas and segments, conveys different historical layers of Kiev. The Soviet-era and the echoes of the Second World War in the post-war years of urban space are especially emphasized. An empirical analysis of the screenplay shows that the film “Kiev Frescoes” is a continuation of the Kiev supertext of the Soviet era and is of great interest for analyzing urban space and for identifying the functions of individual city buildings, squares, sculptures, and monuments. Examination of the screenplay reveals that Parajanov was preparing to create a Soviet film thematically and a modernist one by means of visualization. An analysis of the large context of “Kiev frescoes” showed that the Soviet film establishment was unable to understand the author’s intention, representing the 20th anniversary of the Great Victory in Kiev. The screenplay “Kiev frescoes” reveals not only the psychological problems of the city’s inhabitants but also the content of their imaginary post-war Kiev. The analysis of Parajanov’s intentions in the screenplay showed that he wanted to dynamically present the ancient and new (Soviet) Kiev, the “soul” of the city thanks to the details (fresco), fragmentation, and metaphors. The spectator had to be in the creative process all the time, in dialogue with the text: to conjecture, reconstruct, understand, and recreate visual signs at the level of private and public, social. Based on the screenplay and screen tests, the author reconstructed the pre-Soviet-era of Kiev through the details of the sculpture of Prince Vladimir, hetmans (XVI–XVII centuries), and the Soviet-era through the sculpture of Nikolai Shchors, standing next to Soviet generals as spectators of the parade, as well as through boots, greatcoats, uniforms, medals, orders, stars, mass graves, the Pobeda car, German trophies (accordion in a German case). Based on the screenplay, in which various phenomena, things, and objects were mentioned, two hypernyms “profane” and “sacred” were identified, indicating different functions of objects in the urban space. In the context of the hypernym “profane”, the authors analyzed the “third place” of Soviet Kiev (cafes, circus), as well as infrastructure (tram, metro). The subject of the analysis was also the Soviet way of life (refrigerators, motorcycles with a sidecar, shopping bags) and gastronomic hyponyms (orange, Ukrainian borsch, Kiev cake). The "sacred" of the city was presented through the example of the National Museum of the Ukrainian SSR (Museum of Art named after Bogdan and Varvara Khanenko) and the Holy Dormition Kiev Caves Lavra (XI century) since these social institutions and artifacts were indicated in the script. All the above-mentioned details and phenomena in the “Kiev frescoes” functioned as “speaking” indexes-signs or image-signs, with the help of which Parajanova conveyed both the pre-Soviet and Soviet layers of Kiev.

Keywords: Kiev text, Kiev supertext, cinema language, Parajanov, “Kiev frescoes”, Soviet Ukraine, Victory Day, holiday in cinema.

 

REFERENCES

Activists plan 2016 – Activists plan to demolish the monument of Shchors, Kiev City State Administration against. BBC NEWS Ukraine. 2016. URL: https://clck.ru/asUXy. In Russian.

 

Antipenko 2013 – Antipenko A. His motto was – to give. The screen world of Sergei Parajanov. Collection of articles. Compiled by Yu. Morozov. Kiev, 2013. P. 77–82. In Russian.

Ayvazyan 2005 – Ayvazyan A. Only one life. Yerevan, 2005. In Armenian.

 

Bakhchinyan 2009 – Bakhchinyan A. Federico Fellini-Sergey Parajanov. Brothers never met in the shop. Azg (Nation. Լ iner about culture). 21.11. 2009․ In Armenian.

Bakhchinyan 2009 – Bakhchinyan A. Sergey Parajanov et Federico Fellini. Des confrères qui ne se sont jamais rencontres. “Fellinicità”. Ed. Jean-Max Mejean. Paris, 2009. P. 234–237. In French.

 

Burago 2016 – Burago E. G. City Semiotics: Kiev as a culture text. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics. 2016. 2. P. 35–40. In Russian.

 

Chernenko 1989 – Chernenko M. Journey to the collapse of poetics. Art of cinema. 1989. 5. P. 70–74. In Russian.

 

Chukovsky 1969 – Chukovsky K. My Whitman. Moscow, 1969. In Russian.

 

Derevianko 1990 – Derevianko T. Back in 1965... Art of cinema. 1990. 5. P. 55–62. In Russian.

 

Katanyan 1994 – Katanyan V. Sergey Parajanov: The Price of an eternal holiday. Moscow, 1994. In Russian.

 

Katanyan 1997 – Katanyan V. Touching idols. Moscow, 1997. In Russian.

 

Kiev. Encyclopedic reference book 1985 – Kiev. Encyclopedic reference book (Editor-inchief A.V. Kudritsky). 2-nd ed. Kiev, 1985. In Russian.

 

Levin 1990 – Levin E. Foreword. Art of cinema. 1990. 5. P. 41–42. In Russian.

 

Lotman 1987 – Lotman Y. The novelty of the legend. Art of cinema. 1987. 5. P. 63–67. In Russian.

 

Madoyan 2001 – Madoyan R. "The Color of Pomegranate" and the Legend of Parajanov. California / Glendale, 2001. In Armenian.

 

Oeler 2016 – Oeler K. A Collective Interior Monologue: Sergej Parajanov and Eisenstein’s Joyce-Inspired Vision of Cinema. The Modern Language Review. 2016. Vol. 101. 2. P. 472–487.

 

Parajanov 1990 – Parajanov S. Kiev Frescoes. Art of cinema. 1990. 5. P. 43–54. In Russian.

 

Parajanov 1999 – Parajanov S. Confessions of Sergei Parajanov, ...collected and coined by Garegin Zakoyan. Film studies notes. 1991. 44. URL: https://clck.ru/bX995. In Russian.

 

Parajanov 2011 – Parajanov S. “If an Artist is not believed after forty, then he will not be believed in the next world...”. Speech to the creative and scientific youth of Belarus on December 1, 1971. Continent. 2011. 150. In Russian.

 

Parajanov 2020 – Parajanov S. Pomegranate of Love. Moscow, 2020. In Russian.

 

Pashayan 2018 – Pashayan A. Sergey Parajanov. Yerevan, 2018. In Armenian.

Rosenbaum 2015 – Rosenbaum A. Chestnuts have blossomed. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUqfIX0VB6Q. In Russian.

 

Roshen – Trademark “Roshen”: Kiev cake. URL: https://clck.ru/bX9tb. In Russian.

 

Sergei Parajanov Maestro 2019 – Sergei Parajanov Maestro 2019: [Album of Fine Works]. Compiled by V. Barkhudaryan, V. Zhuravleva. Yerevan, 2019. In Russian.

 

Simyan 2019 a – Simyan T. S. Sergey Parajanov as a text: man, habitus, and interior (on the material of visual texts). ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2019. 3. P. 197–215. In Russian.

 

Simyan 2019 b – Simyan T. S. Old Tiflis in the memory of different generations: painting, cafe, city sunset (by the example of V. Elibekyan, A. Ayvazyan). Syuzhetologiya i Syuzhetografiya (Studies in Theory of Literary Plot and Narratology). 2019. 1. P. 259–276. In Russian.

 

Steffen 2009 – Steffen D. "Kiev Frescoes": Sergei Parajanov's unrealized film project. The screen world of Sergei Parajanov. Collection of articles. Compiled by Yu. Morozov. Kiev, 2013. P. 83–106. In Russian.

 

Stepanyan / Simyan 2012 – Stepanyan A. A. Simyan T. S. Yerevan as a semiotic text. Critique and semiotics, 2012. 16. P. 6–16. In Russian.

Tsereteli 2008 – Collage on the background of a self-portrait. Life is a game. Author of the idea, preface, comments, compilation, and selection of illustrations by K. Tsereteli. Nizhny Novgorod, 2008. In Russian.

 

Whitman 1855 – Whitman Wh․ Leaves of Grass. Brookline. New York, 1855. URL: https://whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1860/poems/51

 

Zadornov 1992 – Zadornov M. Nikhrenaska, 1992. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF67XBSM20s. In Russian.

 

Zagrebelny 2011 – Zagrebelny M. Sergey Parajanov. Kharkov, 2011. In Russian.

 

About author

 

Tigran S. Simyan

Dr. Sci. (Philology), Professor of the Department of Foreign Literature
Yerevan State University, Armenia
E-mail: [email protected]

 

For citation:
Simyan T. S. Kiev of the Soviet-Era from Parajanov’s Point of View: “Kiev Frescoes”. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2021. 1. P. 119–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2021-1-119-141