Square as a Visual Pattern of the Urban Environment

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2023-3(1)-5-31

 

Sergey Avanesov
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia
[email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0002-1081-4871

 

ABSTRACT

 

This article is devoted to the analysis of the square as one of the key visual elements (patterns) of the urban environment. To understand how a city works, it is necessary to find out what urban practices are associated with the square, what its role is in shaping the overall appearance of the city, and in what ways it relates to other visual patterns. The study of the city square in its aesthetic, semiotic, social, and cultural aspects is a necessary part of the discourse, which is focused on the theoretical understanding and practical formation of the overall image of the city. The article deals with questions about the human scale of the square, its cultural functions, artistic integrity, and forms of its participation in the scenography of urban space. A comparison of the closed and open squares is made by referring to some well-known examples. It is shown that a normal urban pattern is a square that combines the properties of ‘openness’ and ‘closedness’ and at the same time includes elements of geometry, architecture, sculpture, and local history in its ensemble. It is concluded that a stable visual pattern of the urban environment can only be such a square that combines several functions, is in obvious combination with patterns of other types, has a human scale, and is a noticeable architectural ensemble. The square can act as a visual dominant of the entire urban structure, determining the general perception of the city, its appearance, and silhouette. At the same time, the city also influences the square, programming its form, style, and function. The degradation of squares, which leads to the degradation of the urban environment as a whole is explained by their dehumanization, functional reduction (the transformation of squares into transport hubs), and, most importantly, the fragmentation of their visual perception. The city square is degrading precisely because the townspeople cease to understand and perceive it as a certain and very complex form of organization of the urban texture, on which both the compositional unity of the city and the continuity of its cultural identity rest.

 

Keywords: urban studies, visual pattern, urban environment, square, urban aesthetics, city image.

 

References

 

Alexander, Ch., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (2014). A Pattern Language. Towns. Buildings. Construction (I. Syrova, Trans.). Art. Lebedev Studio Publishing. (In Russian).

Arkin, D. E. (2013). Images of architecture. B.S.G.-Press. (In Russian).

Arnheim, R. (1984). The dynamics of the architectural form (V. L. Glazychev, Trans.). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

 

Azizyan, I. A., & Kirillova, L. I. (Eds.) (1990). The architectural ensemble as a form of synthesis implementation. VNIITAG. (In Russian).

Baburov, V. V. (Ed.) (1956). Planning and development of cities. Gosstroyizdat. (In Russian).

Belyaeva, E. L. (1977). An architectural spatial environment of the city as an object of visual perception. Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Bunin, A., & Kruglova, T. (1935). Urban complex in the architecture of the Renaissance. In A. I. Lebedev (Ed.), Questions of architecture. (pp. 58–91). Isogis. (In Russian).

Glazychev, V. L. (2021). Urbanistics. Europe Publishing, KDU. (In Russian).

Gurari, M. N. (2022). Revolutionary architecture of the Russian avant-garde in value-civilization tradition (V. Tatlin, K. Melnikov, I. Leonidov). Journal of Visual Theology, 4(2), 277–292. (In Russian).

Gutnov, A. E. (1985). The world of architecture. Molodaya gvardiya. (In Russian).

Kuroda, T. (2014). Lucca 1838. Trasformazione e riuso dei ruderi degli anfiteatri romani in Italia. In M. K. Gesuato (Ed.), Ricerca, Scoperta, Innovazione: L’italia dei Saperi. (pp. 89–108). Istituto Italiano di Cultura – Tokyo.

Likhachev, D. S. (2006). The image of the city and the problem of historical continuity in the development of cultures. In D. S. Likhachev, Reflections on Russia. (pp. 552–570). Logos. (In Russian).

Lynch, K. (1986). A theory of good city form (V. L. Glazychev, Trans.). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Markuzon, V. F. (1986). Antique elements in the architecture of the Italian Renaissance. In Culture of the Renaissance. (pp. 54–68). Nauka. (In Russian).

Mikoleit, A., & Pürckhauer, M. (2020). Urban Code. 100 Lessons for Understanding the City (A. Tarasenko, Trans.). Strelka Press. (In Russian).

Pålsson, K. (2019). How to design humane cities. Dom Publishers. (In Russian).

Revzin, G. (2019). How the city works. Strelka Press. (In Russian).

Savarenskaya, T. F. (1987). Western European Urban Planning of the 17th–19th centuries. Aesthetic and Theoretical Background. Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Sedlmayr, G. (1936). Composition of the Capitol Square. In Architectural Creativity of Michelangelo. (pp. 97–103). All-Union Academy of Architecture Publishing. (In Russian).

Sekretar, L. A. (2019). Sophia Square and its importance in the life of provincial Novgorod in 1778–1917. In B. D. Grekov (Ed.), Novgorod Historical Collection, 18(28). (pp. 123–152). Oblono. (In Russian).

Sitte, C. (1993). The art of building cities (Ya. A. Krastins, Trans.) Stroyizdat. (In Russian).

Sudjic, D. (2020). The language of cities (M. Korobochkin, Trans.). Strelka Press. (In Russian).

Tolnay, K. (1936). Capitol. In Architectural Creativity of Michelangelo. (pp. 94–96). All Union Academy of Architecture Publishing. (In Russian).

 

 

About author

Sergey S. Avanesov
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor
Director of the Research and Educational
Centre for Humanitarian Urbanistics
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University 41, Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya ul.,
Veliky Novgorod, 173003, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0002-1081-4871
Web of Science ResearcherID: V-5869-2018
Scopus AuthorID: 55270461000
e-mail: [email protected]

 

For citation:
Avanesov, S. S. (2023). Square as a visual pattern of the urban environment. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 3(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2023-3(1)-5-31