Published

15.12.2021

Issue

№ 1 (2021): URBIS ET ORBIS

Section

Articles

When a House Becomes a Castle

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2021-1-151-171

 

Gayane S. Margaryan
Russian-Armenian University, Yerevan, Armenia
E-mail: [email protected]

ORCID: 0000-0002-3833-1193

 

Abstract 

 

China's history is rich in urban planning traditions. In some regions of the country, in different epochs, several forms of dormitories were developed, which gave rise to original forms of urban dwelling. In this article we have considered two types of dwellings: the most common type, the traditional house of Siheyuan, also known as "Beijing house", or "Beijing courtyard", and a less common, atypical for large urban centers, but interesting with regard to urban planning and social structure, a house called "Tulou". Both of these types of dwellings in the form and principles of the hostel are expressions of the system-forming features of the general Chinese mentality and the cultural concept of Zhongguo and at the same time the conceptual features of the urban planning principles of different ethnic groups and sub-ethnoses of the Celestial Empire. They are united by one important feature of the traditional and, in many ways, modern Chinese mentality: clan system. The idea of a family clan was "fueled" by Confucian ancestor cults and filial piety. Whole clans lived in the houses of Siheyuan, the houses themselves were named after clans (for example, the house of Zhao) and these clans were urban, like Shakespeare's Montagues and Capulets. They fought for spheres of influence, reconciled, concluding tandems with each other, but they were all united by their commitment to urban living standards and urban values. The inhabitants of Tulou were not representatives of the titular Han nation, they were representatives of the Hakka people. They erected then-gigantic buildings away from large urban centers, at first explicitly opposing themselves to the former nation, but later some of these houses became city-forming elements, overgrown with urban infrastructure, and turned into citadels. Typologically, tulous are similar to Scottish medieval castles, North Caucasian Vainakh towers, kasbah citadels in the Maghreb countries, as well as Israeli kibbutz. The relations of the inhabitants of Tulou, the Hakka mountain people, with other inhabitants of the Middle Empire were not easy. The whole history of the Hakka people in Zhongguo China has been a struggle to preserve their ethnicity and identity. The Tulou castle houses have helped this proud people to survive and preserve their mentality. In fact, the Tulou houses reproduce the peculiarities of the Hakka people's attitude and character (individualism and self-isolationism), while the Siheyuan houses reflect the mental features and the lifestyle of the Han people which is the titular nation of the Middle Kingdom (collectivism and hierarchy). According to researchers, the concepts of the Confucian world order were used as the basis of the Siheyuan dwelling, while Tulou castles were built according to the principles of the Taoist canon. The Confucian world order is based on the man-family-state scheme, whereas the Taoist worldview tradition is based on the individual-family-universe paradigm.

 

Keywords: siheyuan, tulou, hakka, planning principles, architectural complexes, world order, Confucian building traditions, facade, interior space of the house.

 

REFERENCES


Anashina 2021 – Anashina M. Spatial-numerical schemes "he-tu" and "lo-shu". Roads of the Middle Way. 2021. URL: https://anashina.com/chislovye-sxemy-hetu-i-luoshu. In Russian.


Baranov et al. 2004 – Baranov D. A., Baranova O. G., Madleskaya E. L. et al. Russian hut: the interior of the hut, furniture, and decoration of the hut, household, and household utensils. Illustrated encyclopedia. St. Petersburg, 2004. In Russian.


Belovinsky 2007 – Belovinsky L. V. Krasny ugol. Illustrated encyclopedic historical and everyday dictionary of the Russian people. XVIII – the beginning of the XIX century. Ed. by N. Eremina. Moscow, 2007. In Russian.


Christiansen 1998 – Christiansen F. Hakka: the Politics of Global Ethnic Identity Building. Aalborg, 1998.


Cohen 1968 – Cohen M. China and Christianity: The Missionary Movement and the Growth of Chinese Antiforeignism, 1860–1870. Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1968.


Constable 1994 – Constable N. Christian Souls and Chinese Spirits. A Hakka Community in Hong Kong. Berkeley-Los Angeles-Oxford. 1994.


Erbaugh 1992 – Erbaugh M. S. The Secret History of the Hakkas: The Chinese Revolution as a Hakka Enterprise. China Quarterly. 132. 1992. P. 937–968.


Glukhareva 1971 – Glukhareva O. N. in the Architecture of China of the VI–X centuries. Ed. by A.M. Pribytkova et al. Architecture of China VI–X centuries. General History of Architecture in 12 volumes. Volume 9. Moscow, 1971. P. 345–361. In Russian.


Ilyasov 2009 – Ilyasov L. Culture of the Chechen people. Moscow, 2009.


Knapp 2000 – Knapp R. G. China’s old dwellings. Honolulu, 2000.


Kravtsova 2004 – World Art culture. History of Chinese Art: Textbook. Ed. by M. K. Kravtsova. St. Petersburg, 2004. In Russian.


Lee 2005 – Lee Kh. Ch. Pioneers of Modern China: Understanding the Inscrutable Chinese. Singapore, 2005.


Leong 1985 – Leong S.-Th. The Hakka Chinese of Lingnan: Ethnicity and Social Change in Modern Times. Ideal and Reality: Social and Political Change in Modern China, 1860–1949. Ed. by David Pong and Edmund S. K. Fung, eds. Lanham, Maryland. Р. 287–326.


Leong, 1997 – Leong S.-Th. Migration and Ethnicity in Chinese History: Hakkas, Pengmin, and Their Neighbors. Stanford, 1997.


Leung 2012 – Leung W. K.L. A Qualitative Study in the Ethnic Identification Processes of Hakka People in Hong Kong: The Role of Family Socialization among Generations of Hakka. Discovery – SS Student E-Journal. 1. 2012. P. 140–153.


Liu 2014 – Liu L. Hakka Chinese Political Leadership in East and Southeast Asia, and South America. September 20, 2014. URL: https://liamchingliu.wordpress.com/2014/09/20/hakka-chinese-political-leadership-in-east-and-southeast-asia-and-south-america/

 

Lo 1965 – Lo W. Communal Strife in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Kwangtung: The Establishment of Ch’ih-Ch’i. Papers on China. 19. Cambridge. P. 85–119.


Markovin 1980 – Markovin V. I. Monuments of architecture in mountainous Chechnya (based on research materials 1957–1965). North Caucasus in antiquity and the Middle Ages. Moscow, 1980. P. 184–270. In Russian.


Min 1998 – Min Chu. On the question of the translation of vocabulary related to the culture of Russian home economics (based on the material of literary translation from Russian into Chinese). Russian Language Abroad. 1998. 4. P. 91–95. In Russian.


Minahan 2014 – Minahan J. B. Hakka. Ethnic Groups of North, East, and Central Asia: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, 2014.


Nersesyants 1999 – Nersesyants V. S. History of Political and Legal doctrines: textbook. Ed. 2nd. Moscow, 1999. In Russian.


Reid 2006 – Reid S. Castles and Tower Houses of the Scottish Clans, 1450–1650. Botley, 2006.


Rhee 2007 – Rhee H. B. Asian Millenarianism: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Taiping and Tonghak Rebellions in a Global Context. Youngstown, 2007.


Roberts 1969 – Roberts J. A. G. The Hakka-Punti War. Oxford 1969.

 

Rubinstein 1998 – Rubinstein M. A. The Seventeenth-Century Transformation: Taiwan under the Dutch and the Cheng Regime. Routledge. 1998. P. 84–106.


Shcheblykin 1928 – Shcheblykin I. P. The art of the Ingush in the monuments of material culture. Vladikavkaz, 1928. In Russian.


Shepherd 1993 – Shepherd J. R. Statecraft and Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier, 1600–1800. Stanford, 1993. P. 469–470.


Steiner (a) 1990 – Steiner E. S. About personality, mainly in Japan and China, although strictly speaking, there was no personality in Japan and China. Odysseus. A Man in History. Moscow, 1990. P. 38–47. In Russian.


Steiner (b) 1990 - Steiner E. S. The phenomenon of man in the Japanese tradition: personality or quasi-personality? Man and Culture: Individuality in the history of culture. Collection of articles. Moscow, 1990. P. 164–190. In Russian.


Surhone et al. 2010 – Surhone L. M., Tennoe M. T., Henssonow S. F. Punti-Hakka Clan Wars. Riga, 2010.


Tabraham 2005 – Tabraham C. J. Scotland’s Castles. London, 2005.

Tikhomirova, Zhao 2012 – Tikhomirova E. E., Zhao Ts. When the Housing becomes the house: semantic filling in the Chinese and Russian cultures. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. 3 (7) 2012. P. 99–103. In Russian.


Tingyu 1929 – Tingyu X. Origin and Migrations of the Hakkas. Chinese Social and Political Science Review. 13. 1929. P. 202–227.


Wormald 1991 – Wormald J. Court, Kirk, and Community: Scotland, 1470–1625. Edinburgh, 1991.


Yurkevich 2006 – Yurkevich A. G. Spiritual culture of China. Encyclopedia: in 5 Vols. Ed. by Titarenko M. L. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2006. P. 378–382. In Russian.


Zhao 2012 – Zhao I. Architectural and artistic and subject-spatial environment of the traditional Chinese dwelling "siheyuan": XIII–XIX centuries. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Art History. Novosibirsk, 2012. In Russian.


Zheng 1989 – Zheng De Lua A Study of Armed Conflicts between the Punti and the Hakka in Central Kwangtung, 1856–1867. The Hong Kong University Theses Collection. Hong Kong, 1989.


Zheng et al. 2008 – Zheng G. Hu D., Lin Y., Jian W., Chang H. Nomination of Cultural Property for Inscription on the World Heritage List: Fujian Tulou. 2008. URL: http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/1113.pdf.

 

Zhirov, Kolesnik 2013 – Zhirov M. S. Kolesnik V. N. Icon as a reflection of а Russian’s Existentia. Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. 2013. Vol. 26. Issue 23 (166). P. 234–243. In Russian.

 

About author

 

Gayane S. Margaryan

PhD in Art History
Professor of the Department of Russian and World Literature and Culture.
Russian-Armenian University, Yerevan, Armenia
E-mail: [email protected]

 

For citation:
Margaryan G. When a House Becomes a Castle. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2021. 1. P. 151–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2021-1-151-171